
Replace the workflow layer, keep your systems of record
SaaS Replacement
Every subscription is a small monthly bill and a small monthly compromise. We help you work out which ones are worth owning, then build those as custom software that belongs to you. The build is funded by the subscriptions it retires, and what you get is yours outright: the code, the data and the roadmap.
Book a CallCommon problems
The subscriptions arrive on different dates, sit in different budgets, and get renewed by different people. Individually, each one is defensible. Together, they're one of the largest line items in the business, and no one has seen them on a single page.

You Pay for All of It, Use a Fraction
Enterprise tiers bundle features you'll never open to unlock the one you need. You're subsidizing a product for the median customer, and you are not the median customer.

Your Workflow Bends to Their Template
When the tool can't represent how you operate, your team builds a workaround. That workaround becomes the real process. You're paying a vendor to tell you how to work.

Your Data Sits on Someone Else's Servers
Governed by terms you didn't write, behind export limits and metered APIs. The information your business generates is the one asset that should never be rented.
The numbers
You're not asking for new budget against a promise. You're redirecting money you already spend, from renting a workflow to owning one.

One figure, everything in it, per year. The total cost is what drives the decision rather than the price of any single tool, and it gives teams a clearer view of the value they receive.

Beneath named tools lies a forgotten layer: seats of those gone, quietly renewed trials, often larger than expected.

We can run the work against a licence renewal, so you won't pay twice. If a contract is due in autumn, that's the project deadline.

If the numbers don't clear that bar, the replacement shouldn't happen. A project that has to pay for itself can't quietly become a money pit.
Break-even at month 17. After that it runs almost flat, and the widening gap is yours to keep.
* The build and hosting figures in the illustration are an example, not a quote. Where your break-even lands depends on what you replace and what it costs to build.
Keep or replace
Sold at a scale you cannot match, by teams larger than yours. They work. Rebuilding them buys independence and something worse.
The tools that hold your process, your data and your permissions. Keep the systems of record, replace the workflow layer around them.
HighFrictionLow
Replace
Hurts daily, comes out cleanly
Leave alone
Unwinding costs more than the friction
Leave alone
Nothing to fix
Leave alone
Nothing to fix, and expensive to touch
LowCost to unwindHigh

A Roadmap That Has Diverged from You
Your requests sit in a queue behind everyone else's.

Nobody Inside Owns It
No one can say what it is for, or who still needs it.

It Will Not Join Up
Every connection to your other systems is one you build and maintain.

A Renewal You Can Use
A large licence coming due is leverage, a deadline, and freed budget in one.
Rarely one tool swapped for one build. The return is largest where a single owned system replaces several at once, because the same work was smeared across all of them.
The short list

Deals moving the way your team actually sells, not the way a template assumes.

Boards, stages, and approvals shaped to your delivery process.

The dashboards and back-office screens that hold your operation together.

Self-service built into your system, not bolted on beside it.

Your numbers, from your own data, without per-seat BI fees.

Queues and histories that match how your team handles cases.

Directory, leave, and onboarding, priced per company rather than per employee.

Built into the workflow instead of sitting next to it.

Order, fulfillment and merchandising workflows built around the platform you keep.
How it runs
Replacement projects tend to fail the same way: no audit, no scope discipline. This is the sequence we run instead.
Trusted by 100+ companies
At handover

Your Code
The full source, in your repository, yours to modify or hand to anyone else.

Your Data
In a database you control, on infrastructure you choose.

Your Roadmap
You decide what gets built next. There is no queue and no vote.

Your Costs
Infrastructure and whatever support you choose. No per-seat fees, no renewal increases.
The test of a good handover
is whether you could walk away from us and keep running. If you couldn't, we'd have delivered a dependency, which is the thing you hired us to remove.
Keep reading



FAQ
Tell us about your store and we will come back with straight answers.
Book a CallNo. It targets the workflow layer where a vendor's template is costing you money or control. Infrastructure, systems of record that work, and commodity tools stay rented. The aim is to own what makes you different and rent what doesn't.
It should, or it shouldn't happen. The work is funded by the subscriptions it retires, and we'll show you the three-year cost of both paths before anything starts. If owning doesn't clear the bar, we'll tell you.
That scar is usually real. It came from a specific era: a dev shop, a specification that ran to hundreds of pages and was wrong by the time it shipped, and years of dependency on the only people who understood the code. What's changed is the cost of building and maintaining software, and the size of team it now takes. The failure mode you remember was a product of its conditions, and those conditions have changed.
Consolidation reduces the number of vendors, usually by standardizing on one large platform. You can consolidate and still rent your entire operation. Replacement changes who owns the workflow: your data, your permissions, your pace of change.
Ledger, payroll, cloud infrastructure, and security tooling, always. Plus any system of record that genuinely works and holds years of history. We'll put the keep-list in writing before we propose a single build.
Whoever you choose. We can support it, train your team to run it, or help you hire someone. Every engagement names an owner at handover, and all three paths need to be viable. If none of them is, we built the wrong thing.
It's migrated and verified as part of the build. Extracting data from a SaaS platform is almost always harder than people expect, so we plan and budget for it explicitly rather than treating it as a final step.
It depends entirely on what's in scope, which is why the audit and the three-tier scoping come first. You'll have a timeline alongside a fixed quote before any build begins.
Let’s build something great together!
Bring us your biggest renewal. On the call we'll talk through whether it's a genuine candidate for ownership or something you're better off continuing to rent. If it's the second one, that's what we'll say.